Financial Crime Compliance
Financial Crime Compliance ensures organisations meet regulatory obligations and protect against threats such as money laundering, terrorist financing, fraud, and sanctions violations. It combines due diligence, monitoring, and governance to safeguard financial integrity and operational resilience.
Have a question? Connect with a TEN Expert
Who is it valuable for?
Financial institutions, corporates, investors, law firms, compliance and risk management teams.
- AML/CTF frameworks and regulatory compliance support
- Management and Enhanced Due Diligence across high-risk jurisdictions
- Crypto due diligence and investor assurance
- Ultimate Beneficial Ownership (UBO) analysis
- Politically Exposed Person (PEP) and sanctions screening
Regulatory Compliance equips organisations to meet financial services regulations, market listing rules, and governance standards. It provides assurance that directors, shareholders, and senior managers meet “Fit and Proper” requirements while maintaining investor and regulator confidence.
Who is it valuable for?
Nominated Advisers, brokers, venture capital and private equity firms, corporate finance teams, listed companies, and regulated financial institutions.
What We Cover
- Compliance with FCA’s Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR)
- AIM (London Stock Exchange) director/shareholder compliance checks
- Anti-corruption and anti-money laundering policy alignment
- FCPA compliance programme design and implementation
- Background checks for regulated financial services providers
- Management Due Diligence (MDD) with regulatory references
- Cyber risk assessments and ICT due diligence
When assessing the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing, organisations must check whether any high-risk factors apply. Failure to do so can expose them to regulatory breaches, reputational damage, and financial crime.
What we cover
If your Organisation is dealing with individuals or companies established in high-risk jurisdictions, or exposed to other cases of high risk, we help can help identify:
- The areas of risk and apply enhanced due diligence measures to manage and mitigate those risks appropriately.
- Whether any business relationships are conducted in unusual circumstances
- Customers that operate in geographical areas of higher risk, including areas with no AML/CTF legislation, significant corruption, UN sanctions, or links to designated terrorist organisations
- Whether any individuals are using personal asset-holding vehicles
- Customers who only have nominee shareholders or shares
- If any customers are cash-intensive
- Ownership structures of customers that appear unusual or excessively complex given the nature of their business
- Whether any business relationships are based on anonymity
- If your organisation has received funds from unknown parties
Who is it valuable for?
Banks, insurers, multinational corporates, crypto platforms, regulated entities, and compliance teams operating in high-risk sectors or regions.
Crypto Due Diligence reduces risks linked to anonymity, fraud, and regulatory uncertainty in digital asset markets. It verifies counterparties, platforms, and developers to protect investors and ensure compliance with evolving global standards.
Who it’s valuable for
Crypto platforms, investors, ICOs, VASPs, fintech companies, and regulators.
What We Cover
- Enhanced Due Diligence through discreet references and industry insight interviews
- Background checks on ICO and crypto platform management
- Verification of ownership, directors, and developers
- Transaction monitoring and suspicious activity reporting
- AML/CTF checks for ICOs, VAs, and VASPs
- Fraud prevention measures and source of funds verification
UBO analysis identifies the true individuals who control or benefit from a business, reducing the risk of hidden ownership, corruption, and money laundering. Accurate, audited, and up-to-date information on beneficial owners is essential in deterring financial crime and uncovering individuals who may attempt to conceal their identity behind complex corporate structures.
A beneficial owner is any natural person who ultimately owns or controls the customer. Under most Anti-Money Laundering (AML) directives, a shareholding of 25% or more (by a natural person or corporate entity) is considered an indicator of ownership. Organisations may, however, apply stricter thresholds depending on their own risk-based criteria.
In rare cases, where all other identification measures are exhausted and no suspicion arises, senior managing officials may be treated as the beneficial owners.
How can we help?
- As part of the risk-based approach, we help organisations reduce the likelihood of financial crime, assisting with customer and enhanced due diligence
- identify the customer and verify the customer’s identity on the basis of documents, data or information obtained from a reliable and independent source
- take reasonable measures to verify the beneficial owner’s identity
- take reasonable measures to understand the ownership and control structure of the customer
- verify the control structure and ultimate beneficial owner
- conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship including scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure compliance
- verify that any person purporting to act on behalf of the customer is authorised and identify and verify the identity of that person
When dealing with Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), organisations are required to implement risk-based procedures to determine whether a customer, or their ultimate beneficial owner qualifies as a PEP. Approval from senior management to establish or continue business relationships with PEPs is required.
How can we help Your Organisation stay PEP compliant?
We support your Orgnaisation in meeting PEP compliance obligations by:
- checking and verifying sanction lists and registers to identify PEPs, close associates and subjects of interest
- establishing the source of wealth or funds that are involved in business relationships or transactions with PEPs
- conducting enhanced, ongoing monitoring of business relationships with PEPs
Important Notes
- Post-office monitoring: If a PEP is no longer in a prominent public role, organisations must continue enhanced due diligence for at least 12 months, until the PEP is considered to no longer pose a risk.
- Preventative measures: EU Directive measures are preventative, not criminal. Being a PEP does not imply involvement in wrongdoing.
- Fair engagement: While PEPs carry higher risk due to their exposure to corruption, organisations should not automatically refuse a business relationship based solely on PEP status, doing so would go against the ethos of the Directive.
- Extended scope: EU Directive measures also apply to family members and known close associates of PEPs.
Insights & Case Studies
-
Posted in:
M&S Cyber Attack Updates 2025: What Happened So Far?
Ransomware and cyberattacks are growing in both frequency and sophistication as the digital age develops. Having explored the UK Government’s approach to these new challenges previously, we have seen a recent explosion of ransomware attacks over the past few months, particularly targeting the British retail industry; most notably, the M&S cyber attack. Matt Hull, a…
-
Posted in:
Toyota Bank Polska Fined for GDPR Failings
Why was Toyota Bank Fined and how much? In early 2025, Toyota Bank Polska S.A. was hit with a significant fine by the Polish Data Protection Authority (UODO) for breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The bank was penalised to the tune of PLN 576,220 (approximately £115,000) for two major failings: Lack of…
-
Posted in:
Is Shein breaking EU consumer laws?
Shein has rapidly grown into one of the world’s largest online fast fashion retailers, offering ultra-low prices and an ever-changing catalogue of trendy clothing. Its ability to produce and distribute garments at an unprecedented speed has made it a dominant force in the industry. However, this business model has come under scrutiny, particularly in the…
✴
London: Enhanced Due Diligence – AIM Listed Company
TenIntelligence were tasked by a Nominated Advisor to provide due diligence services on an individual being considered for a Board position. Our thorough desk-based research revealed that the Subject had misled the client regarding his previous experience, but otherwise had no adverse financial, regulatory, insolvency, sanction or media exposure.
Subsequent interviews with well-placed human sources revealed that the Subject had been accused of insider trading and defrauding their clients, and had behaved inappropriately towards colleagues.
✴
Security & Privacy Review – Breach
TenIntelligence recently performed a Cyber/Data security review of a client’s technology and security capabilities following a reported security breach. In order to provide assurance it met the extensive information security challenges for the digital age of business, our consultants performed penetration testing analysis, cyber security systems evaluation and an assessment of information security procedures. The incident itself was a targeted phishing campaign, followed up with social engineering of several team members over a period of months, resulting in the change of supplier bank accounts details, allowing the perpetrator the mechanism to obtain funds by way of fraud.
Frequently Asked Questions
Our investigations cover regulatory standing, sanctions, litigation, employment, education, financial records, and reputational checks across jurisdictions.
Typically, 5–15 business days depending on jurisdiction, complexity, and the availability of records.
Yes. All our checks are conducted in line with data protection regulations and local privacy laws.
Yes. We conduct independent interviews with industry peers and former colleagues, ensuring discretion while providing valuable insights.
Yes. Our team speaks multiple languages and works with trusted local partners to conduct research in native languages.
